Why the Human Rights Act matters for people with mental health conditions

Human rights, eh? Cue eye-rolling exasperation from Conservative politicians and right wing press. Prime Minister David Cameron opines that the UK Human Rights Act, passed in 1998 and implemented in 2000, has created a “chilling culture” among people who worry they will “fall foul” of it. Home Secretary Theresa May says the Act needs to go. Cameron and May exemplify a belief that the HRA primarily exists for protecting criminals and illegal immigrants, and stops government employees such as police officers, border and immigration staff, and teachers from doing their jobs.

Well, you see, that’s the inconvenient thing about human rights. They protect everyone, including those whom the state or the media deems to be unpleasant or undesirable. They enshrine the principle that one cannot be more or less human than another member of our species, and offer legal protection of the rights guaranteed under the European Convention of Human Rights, without cases having to be taken all the way to Strasbourg.

If you have a mental health problem, physical disability, or learning disability, the Human Rights Act should particularly matter to you. Let’s not forget where the European Convention of Human Rights came from. It was drafted in 1950, as a direct response to the horrific human rights abuses that took place in Europe in the 1930s and 40s. The Nazi regime targeted individuals for imprisonment, torture and murder not just on the basis of their ethnicity (Jews, Poles, Roma), nationality (Russian POWs) and political beliefs (communists and dissidents), but also on grounds of sexual orientation (gay men and lesbians), gender identity (trans people), and disability. Deaf people and people with learning disabilities, physical disabilities, and mental health conditions were all on the receiving end of Nazi eugenics policies, initially through forcible sterilisation, which affected an estimated 300,000-400,000 residents of state institutions from 1934 onwards. During this period, the Nazi government instigated a propaganda campaign which encouraged German citizens to see disabled and mentally ill people as a costly burden on the state, for whom the most effective solution was “euthanasia”.Towards the end of the 1930s, the regime moved to the secretive “Operation T4”, which saw people in institutions for the mentally unwell and learning disabled begin to be systematically murdered by the staff “caring” for them, using lethal injection, starvation and, later, gas chambers.

Harrumphing about human rights comes from an assumption that the legislation has “gone too far”, because the basic rights of the citizen in Europe today are pretty much now inviolable. However, many European countries continue to have a very poor record on the protection of the rights of people who need mental health care, and this a remains a concern for the World Health Organisation. Greece was asked to “clean up its act” on its appalling institutions for the mentally unwell and intellectually disabled before it was permitted to enter the EU in 1981 (there had been widespread shock at the pictures, which I remember seeing as a child, of naked “patients” chained up on the island of Leros). However, since assimilation into the EU progress in Greece has disappointingly slow, while the World Health Organisation notes that Romania and Bulgaria had similarly shocking records, but were not required to make any changes before being granted EU membership.

Let’s not kid ourselves that people with mental health difficulties are always treated as fully human in the UK. Frightening levels of stigma and discrimination persist, with the Office for National Statistics’ 2007 Attitudes Towards Mental Illness survey finding that 22% of people surveyed thought that the mentally ill were “a burden on society”. Just over a third of people surveyed felt that people with a mental health problems should not have the same right to a job as anyone else; 37% of respondents said it was “frightening” to think of someone with a mental health problem living in their neighbourhood, with the same proportion stating that they would not want to live next door to a person who was mentally ill. 1/5 people thought that there was something about people with mental illnesses that makes it easy to tell them from “normal people” [sic]. A few years ago, I studied an undergraduate module on mental health which was attended by people from a variety of professional backgrounds in health and social care. One student, a trainee mental health nurse, shared with the online study group his view that women with serious mental health problems should be sterilised. That’s right, sterilised. Not offered reversible long-term contraception (which, actually, should be offered to all women – they are under-utilised options, but very effective), but sterilised, regardless of consent. When I challenged his suggestion on human rights grounds, the student nurse stated that if I had seen what he had seen, I would agree with him, while the tutor asked me not to be so “aggressive”. How’s that for a chilling culture?

I like my right to have wanted, cared for children (Article 8). I like my right not to be forced to undergo sterilisation surgery against my will because I am a woman with bipolar (Articles 3 and 14). I like my right to live where I choose (Article 14). No-one likes to be turned down for a job, but when it happens, it want it to be because I didn’t make the grade, not because I’m mentally unwell and someone thinks that means I don’t deserve to be in employment (Article 14). And I sure as hell like to be able to blog about it (Article 10). Save the Human Rights Act.

About purplepersuasion

40 something service user, activist, writer and mother living with bipolar disorder. Proud winner of the Mark Hanson Prize for Digital Media at the Mind Media Awards #VMGMindAwards
This entry was posted in Mental health, Politics and current affairs and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Why the Human Rights Act matters for people with mental health conditions

  1. splendid critique Charlotte. I hope you share this with the PM and your local MP as this government increasingly wants to steamroll over minorities and anybody who doesn’t subscribe to their Boy’s Own gung ho “make Britain great again” rhetoric.

  2. Pingback: The fur flies of the Human Rights Act… and THAT cat… « Spineless Liberal

  3. David says:

    Reminds me of Niemöller:

    When the Nazis came for the communists,
    I did not speak out;
    As I was not a communist.
    When they locked up the social democrats,
    I did not speak out;
    I was not a social democrat.
    When they came for the trade unionists,
    I did not speak out;
    As I was not a trade unionist.
    When they came for the Jews,
    I did not speak out;
    As I was not a Jew.
    When they came for me,
    there was no one left to speak out.
    When the Nazis arrested the Communists,
    I said nothing; after all, I was not a Communist.
    When they locked up the Social Democrats,
    I said nothing; after all, I was not a Social Democrat.
    When they arrested the trade unionists,
    I said nothing; after all, I was not a trade unionist.
    When they arrested me, there was no longer anyone who could protest.

  4. Pingback: Why the Human Rights Act matters for people with mental health conditions | Mental Wellbeing | Scoop.it

  5. Pingback: This Week In Mentalists – The Silent Reading Edition. « This Week in Mentalists

  6. Absolutely spot on as usual.
    Although, I find often that people’s issues are not with the HRA per se, but more their perceived (and media encouraged assumptions of) misuses of it.

  7. John Ager says:

    Great post! Love & peace, John.

  8. Pingback: World Mental Health Day round-up | dailywebday.com

  9. Pingback: World Mental Health Day round-up | HEALTH TRAVEL

  10. Scary stuff isn’t it?

  11. butterflywgs says:

    Great post. Agree entirely.
    Especially this: ‘Well, you see, that’s the inconvenient thing about human rights. They protect everyone, including those whom the state or the media deems to be unpleasant or undesirable.’ Yes. SO few people understand this but even if someone is a complete arsehole, they are still human, and still get human rights. Even Abu Quatada gets human rights, that’s not wrong and an indication, as the right-wing media claim, that the HRA has gone too far – he may be a deeply unpleasant person but he is still a person. We can all do bad things. Even criminal things. ‘Criminals’ don’t have a tattoo on their forehead and sacrifice babies for kicks. People want to dehumanise ‘monsters’. I don’t get it. *Stops stalking you* ;-).

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s